W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-xml@w3.org > September 2011

Re: New editor's draft of the HTML/XML TF Report

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:08:16 -0400
To: <rleif@rleif.com>
Cc: <public-html-xml@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m2y5x9a8in.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Robert Leif" <rleif@rleif.com> writes:

> Norm et al.
> “Do you think there's any possibility of achieving consensus for a
> model that says HTML5 and XHTML5 are that radically different in
> design and philosophy?”
> I do think that it is possible to achieve a consensus for a model.

You're proposal, as I understood it, was that the XHTML serialization
of HTML5 would allow arbitrary namespaces and prefixes, like XML,
while the non-XML serialization would not. If I've understood you
incorrectly, please let me know. If not, I encourage you to shop that
idea around the HTML community. I think you'll find it very difficult
to garner any support at all. But do let me know.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Act from reason, and failure makes you
http://nwalsh.com/            | rethink and study harder. Act from
                              | faith, and failure makes you blame
                              | someone and push harder.

Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2011 23:08:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:28 UTC