W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-xml@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Use case 4 is written up

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:28:13 +0000
Message-ID: <4D3D462D.5010400@nag.co.uk>
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Cc: public-html-xml@w3.org
On 24/01/2011 06:52, John Cowan wrote:
> See http://esw.w3.org/HTML_XML_Use_Case_04 .  It's informally written,
> but I think it's the truth and nothing but the truth (the whole truth
> is rather beyond my scope).

The use case as written up discusses one possible solution (using script 
element) but not others that have been proposed (and implemented in some 
places) of using an element that allows a more xml-style parsing of its 
content (cf math or svg in html5, <xml> in IE, or the "extensions like 
svg" change proposal for html5). I'm not saying one of those should be a 
preferred solution, just noticing that the use case as written isn't so 
much a use case as a discussion of the pros and cons of one possible 
solution (using script)


The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 09:28:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:27 UTC