W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-xml@w3.org > January 2011

Re: The interpretation of script

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:56:50 +0100
Cc: public-html-xml@w3.org
Message-Id: <BC700CEA-91CB-440B-A73F-60F358729C39@berjon.com>
To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
On Jan 18, 2011, at 18:18 , Michael Kay wrote:
> At that point anyone delivering MusicXML content is going to have to worry about delivering it to two kinds of browser, those with native MusicXML support, and those that handle it via a shim. How do we see this being done? Or are we simply going to say "this is more than 12 months away, we'll sort something out when the time comes?"

That's no different from shipping content with SVG today, knowing that some browsers support it and some don't. You test for support (I'm guessing here you'd have Modernizr.musicXML) and if absent throw in the shim.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 08:57:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 19 January 2011 08:57:19 GMT