W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-xml@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Use cases

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:31:14 +0100
To: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: public-html-xml@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vot7uci564w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:15:20 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>  
> Meanwhile, there is clear value in degrading gracefully by serving the  
> same content as text/html to clients that don't support  
> application/xhtml+xml, even if such clients don't get the benefit of the  
> full functionality.

But soon all browsers will support XHTML.

Internet Explorer not supporting XHTML was a problem for people wishing to  
use XHTML. But that is being solved. What other problem is there? (I would  
say, that XHTML is too hard, but that is not being debated.)

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2011 13:31:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:27 UTC