W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-xml@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Detecting XHTML

From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:39:25 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=n0qGzhyDenhOtioZGKTSs=t9Wkdaprd-zHOgU@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Cc: public-html-xml@w3.org
I'm guessing that the tbody example et al. is particularly significant in
the progressive rendering case?

Kurt Cagle
XML Architect
*Lockheed / US National Archives ERA Project*



On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:38 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:

> On 04/01/2011 20:17, Kurt Cagle wrote:
>
>> Frankly, the simplest solution to the problem is to treat ALL HTML as
>> being XHTML up to the point where it refuses to parse,
>>
>
> That doesn't work as there are many well formed xhtml documents that need
> to produce a different dom when parsed as html. (implied tbody being the
> simplest but by no means only example)
>
> David
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2011 22:41:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 January 2011 22:41:18 GMT