W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-xml@w3.org > February 2011

XBL (Was: The interpretation of script)

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:14:38 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTin8tffSvn9wfBoyxCLfhrreRBTekEGYfDZtLk1M@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html-xml@w3.org
Is really XBL not a concern of this task force ?

I think that now that Decentralized Extensibility is dead, XBL is an
important way of light (I mean the version where X meant XML, not the
strange last version)

Mohamed

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:

> > The vocabulary that's next up for getting native support is XBL2. I agree
> with Hixie that should go into the HTML Namespace even though I disapprove
> the way Hixie made the change (and other changes announced at the same time)
> without consulting with relevant stake holders.
>
> Agreed, but that's not a concern for this TF.




-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Monday, 14 February 2011 08:15:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 14 February 2011 08:15:11 GMT