W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org > June 2010

Re: ISSUE-116: provide reference and info about HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives in html5 spec [HTML 5 spec]

From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:01:58 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikv58vgDmsu_-OYcqyHiyv09jQmlH-wMORgAOx2@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: HTML Weekly WG <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Hi sam,
> One week is *not* sufficient time to justify raising an issue.

All that is required from the editor is a simple yes or no response
and as the new heartbeat is due to be published it would be good to
have information in the HTML5 spec, which is why I am pursuing the
issue with such vigour, but as you disagree that it should be raised
now I will remove the issue.

Can you provide me with an esitmate of how much time I should wait
before it is sifficient?

regards
Stevef



On 11 June 2010 12:52, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On 06/11/2010 07:22 AM, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote:
>>
>> I do not beleive that it is beyond the editors capacity to respond
>> one or or the other to my request, in a timely fashion. So am
>> escalating this to an issue.
>
> One week is *not* sufficient time to justify raising an issue.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>



-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Friday, 11 June 2010 12:02:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 11 June 2010 12:02:52 GMT