- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:17:23 -0800
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML Weekly WG <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/93 >>>> >>>> This issue was opened in violation of the process and should be closed >>>> without prejudice. The bug in question was reopened for reconsideration, >>>> meaning the next step in the process is 5.c, not 5.d: >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8379 >>>> >>> >>> You have a point. No new information was added, which is justification >>> for re-opening a bug. >>> >>> However, people have stated they were unaware of this bug. I did cc >>> the HTML WG on the bug, but evidently, the email to the group was >>> ignored, or missed. >> >> It appears to me that it was not distributed. Not sure why it is, but >> cc'ing public-html does not seem to yield the expected results of >> having the list receive bugmail. >> >> / Jonas >> > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Nov/0634.html Yes, but no other emails has been sent to the list. Despite the fact that you cc'ed the public-html list on the bug. / Jonas
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 19:18:16 UTC