- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:22:43 -0600
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: HTML Weekly WG <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote: >> >> ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/93 > > This issue was opened in violation of the process and should be closed > without prejudice. The bug in question was reopened for reconsideration, > meaning the next step in the process is 5.c, not 5.d: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8379 > You have a point. No new information was added, which is justification for re-opening a bug. However, people have stated they were unaware of this bug. I did cc the HTML WG on the bug, but evidently, the email to the group was ignored, or missed. We'll have to leave it up to the co-chairs to make a decision on this one. My inclination is to ensure that people do have a chance to respond, even though you and I are in agreement. > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL Shelley
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 18:23:20 UTC