W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org > September 2009

Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (issue-37 status?)

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:29:45 -0700
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Message-id: <52135F17-3C18-42C9-B317-ECF68061779F@apple.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

On Sep 8, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> I thought issue-37 was closed; ignoring a bit
> of out-of-order discussion is find, but you
> guys are actively participating...
>
> But now I see it's actually pending review
>  http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/37
>
> Is there some proposal in "any objections?" mode?
> When are objections due?
>
> Or is the issue actually open again and tracker has
> fallen a bit behind?

I think the remaining finer-grained issues from Cameron and others all  
need to be filed as bugs. I need to review Cameron's latest email to  
make sure all the issues are represented properly. At that point I  
think there is no objection to closing.

Regards,
Maciej

>
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 13:52 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> On Sep 7, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> [...]
>>> Suggestion: take a random svg image out of wikipedia and search for
>>> "sodipodi".  Getting rid of the errors in a small portion of the
>>> image isn't going to undo the damage to both the adoption of SVG or
>>> the adoption of the conformance checker by flagging the remaining
>>> "errors".
>>
>> I think many of these cases are also errors in SVG 1.1, and are
>> reported as such by the SVG 1.1 validator. Apparently, Wikipedia's
>> adoption of SVG has not been hindered by these errors, though one may
>> at this point doubt their willingness to adopt conformance checking.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
>>
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 21:30:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 September 2009 21:30:33 GMT