Re: toward a schedule of HTML WG issues

Dan Connolly wrote:
>> So, for the first one, would that be 3..6 weeks starting Aug 28?
> 
> No, what I had in mind is: ending 28 Aug.

OK, just wanted that to be clarified. The sooner, the better.

> The norm is that WG members get a week to consider a question
> and respond. The dates above are suggested as the start of that
> week-long period.
> 
> This doesn't give 3 weeks notice on
> head-profile, but I'm reasonably sure all the relevant parties
> have already been in contact with us and said what they
> have to say.

Yes.

 > ...


BR, Julian