W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org > August 2008

Re: toward a schedule of HTML WG issues

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:12:24 +0200
Message-ID: <48AEF378.3080303@gmx.de>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: public-html-wg-issue-tracking <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>

Dan Connolly wrote:
>> So, for the first one, would that be 3..6 weeks starting Aug 28?
> 
> No, what I had in mind is: ending 28 Aug.

OK, just wanted that to be clarified. The sooner, the better.

> The norm is that WG members get a week to consider a question
> and respond. The dates above are suggested as the start of that
> week-long period.
> 
> This doesn't give 3 weeks notice on
> head-profile, but I'm reasonably sure all the relevant parties
> have already been in contact with us and said what they
> have to say.

Yes.

 > ...


BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 17:19:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 August 2008 17:19:56 GMT