Re: toward a schedule of HTML WG issues

Dan Connolly wrote:
> I've been thinking and talking about a schedule
> of issues for a while, e.g. [01 Aug]

Appreciated. I'm looking forward

> My sense of due process says that development groups,
> peer working groups, and such should get 3 to 6 weeks
> notice in preparation for a Working Group
> decision on an issue. Here's a suggestion for
> actually closing some issues:
> 
> 
> 21 Aug
> 28 Aug ISSUE-55 head-profile
>  4 Sep 
> 11 Sep ISSUE-32 table-summary
> 18 Sep ISSUE-31 missing-alt
> 25 Sep
>  2 Oct 
>  9 Oct
> 16 Oct
> 23 Oct (TP week) ISSUE-41 Decentralized-extensibility (requirement)
> 30 Oct

So, for the first one, would that be 3..6 weeks starting Aug 28?

> I'd like to fit some more requirements issues in the
> schedule leading up to the TP week; this is just
> a starting sketch.
> 
> I also suggest we demote many/most of our OPEN issues to RAISED,
> and discourage discussion of issues that aren't OPEN.
>   http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/open

We can try that, but I'm not too optimistic about telling people what to 
discuss. In the worst case, the discussion just moves over to the WHATWG 
list.

> ...

BR, Julian