W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org > August 2008

Re: toward a schedule of HTML WG issues

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:21:12 +0200
Message-ID: <48AEE778.9020802@gmx.de>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: public-html-wg-issue-tracking <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>

Dan Connolly wrote:
> I've been thinking and talking about a schedule
> of issues for a while, e.g. [01 Aug]

Appreciated. I'm looking forward

> My sense of due process says that development groups,
> peer working groups, and such should get 3 to 6 weeks
> notice in preparation for a Working Group
> decision on an issue. Here's a suggestion for
> actually closing some issues:
> 
> 
> 21 Aug
> 28 Aug ISSUE-55 head-profile
>  4 Sep 
> 11 Sep ISSUE-32 table-summary
> 18 Sep ISSUE-31 missing-alt
> 25 Sep
>  2 Oct 
>  9 Oct
> 16 Oct
> 23 Oct (TP week) ISSUE-41 Decentralized-extensibility (requirement)
> 30 Oct

So, for the first one, would that be 3..6 weeks starting Aug 28?

> I'd like to fit some more requirements issues in the
> schedule leading up to the TP week; this is just
> a starting sketch.
> 
> I also suggest we demote many/most of our OPEN issues to RAISED,
> and discourage discussion of issues that aren't OPEN.
>   http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/open

We can try that, but I'm not too optimistic about telling people what to 
discuss. In the worst case, the discussion just moves over to the WHATWG 
list.

> ...

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 16:22:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 August 2008 16:22:06 GMT