Re: Marking non-automated tests

On 07/02/2013 09:59 , Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote:
> External metadata is no-good metadata. Having it in the files is much
> easier and will be less of a problem. I think the proposal makes sense,
> but one thing is that I don't write <html> in my files, but they more
> often than not look like this:
>
>    <!doctype html>
>    <meta charset=utf-8>
>    <title>Awsum test</title>
>
> ... Hmm. This is about manual tests you say? Ohwell, yeah, totally fine
> with requiring the <html> boilerplate on those.  If not, it could always
> look for data-manual on the first few lines.

Yeah I thought of that and came the same conclusion. It doesn't seem 
like too high a tax to pay.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 10:29:31 UTC