W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-testsuite@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Marking non-automated tests

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:29:22 +0100
Message-ID: <51138202.4000803@w3.org>
To: Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>
CC: public-html-testsuite@w3.org
On 07/02/2013 09:59 , Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote:
> External metadata is no-good metadata. Having it in the files is much
> easier and will be less of a problem. I think the proposal makes sense,
> but one thing is that I don't write <html> in my files, but they more
> often than not look like this:
>    <!doctype html>
>    <meta charset=utf-8>
>    <title>Awsum test</title>
> ... Hmm. This is about manual tests you say? Ohwell, yeah, totally fine
> with requiring the <html> boilerplate on those.  If not, it could always
> look for data-manual on the first few lines.

Yeah I thought of that and came the same conclusion. It doesn't seem 
like too high a tax to pay.

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 10:29:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:32 UTC