W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-testsuite@w3.org > April 2013

Re: some WebIDL testing / documentation

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 08:05:08 -0400
Message-ID: <515EBDF4.6060808@nokia.com>
To: ext Dzenana Trenutak <dzenana.trenutak@gmail.com>, Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@gmail.com>, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
CC: public-test-infra-request@w3.org, public-html-testsuite@w3.org
On 4/4/13 1:31 PM, ext Dzenana Trenutak wrote:
> OK, I've added what I gleaned about writing WebIDL tests up here 
> <http://dzenana-trenutak.github.com/GitDocs/W3C_Testsuite_Tutorial/index.html>, 
> updating all around to match the new repo name while I was at it.

Hi - I scanned the WebIDL test tutorial [1] and it contains good info so 
thanks for that! After there is agreement on your question about which 
"flavor" (or perhaps different flavors depending on the use case), then, 
as you say, it would be good to update this document accordingly.

I suspect that creating WebIDL tests to facilitate advancing a spec to 
REC will continue to be somewhat of a pain point for the various WGs 
(not just HTMLWG). As such, perhaps it would be useful to create a 
document that links to various related resources (f.ex. Dzenana's 
tutorials, examples, etc.). Robin, Tobie - WDYT? I didn't notice 
anything like this hanging off of <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Testing> and I 
could create something like <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/WebIDL>. Or 
is the idea to put this documentation somewhere in 

Re the WebIDL parser, your tutorial says to use [2] but it appears the 
WebPerformance WG is using [3] and I noticed [2] is not in 

Would someone please clarify whether new tests should use [2] or [3] 
used? (If [2] is the one, I would appreciate it if someone would please 
see that a copy is placed in w3c-tests.org/resources/.)

-Thanks, AB

[2] <https://github.com/darobin/webidl2.js/blob/develop/lib/webidl2.js>
[3] <http://w3c-test.org/resources/WebIDLParser.js>
Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 12:05:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:32 UTC