W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-testsuite@w3.org > October 2012

Re: HTML Test suite coverage (partial)

From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:15:36 +0200
Message-ID: <5086A688.2090809@opera.com>
To: public-html-testsuite@w3.org
On 10/23/2012 02:56 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:40 +0200, James Graham wrote:
>> On 10/23/2012 01:56 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
>>> As part of trying to get an idea of where we are, I generated a view of
>>> where we have tests or not (attached). It's only partial and I'll try to
>>> improve it by next week. Only covers the HTML5 spec for the moment.
>>
>> Nice start :)
>>
>> It would be interesting to hear what your methodology is. Does this
>> cover approved tests only, or both submitted and approved?
>
> It's a partial covering of the submitted ones. I'm assuming that all
> approved tests are also in the submission directory so I'm not looking
> at those for this report.

I see.

>>   Is it
>> automated or does it it involve lots of manual work still?
>
> All automated so far. It's a bunch a quick and dirty Java code. I can
> put the code in the repository if it is of interest.

Yeah, I think that would be interesting, and make it easier for others 
to pick up this idea in the future.

>> I suggest we cross-reference this with data about what is implemented in
>> browsers; the areas with the biggest delta would be obvious targets for
>> short-term testing effort. If you have some code that generates this
>> output, I could try adding caniuse.com data.
>
> An other way is to generate this apart. As long as the data is
> associated with ids in the documents, we can mash them up later.

Of course.
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 14:16:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2012 14:16:17 GMT