W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-testsuite@w3.org > February 2011

Re: HTML Testing Task Force Conf Call Agenda 1/25/2011

From: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:12:57 +0100
Message-ID: <4D4BDF39.6090907@gmail.com>
To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
CC: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, "'public-html-testsuite@w3.org'" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>

On 02/03/2011 05:49 PM, David Carlisle wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 16:31, Kris Krueger wrote:
>> [08:18]<krisk> we have a bug for one of the recently approved
>> innerHTML uses on mathml
>> [08:19]<krisk> They are xml based elements - so no innerHTML
> hmph, I did flag that one at the time it was submitted as relying on a
> spec bug being fixed. and it notes it again in a comment.
> <!--
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11204
> -->
> My understanding of that bug is that the definition of innerhtml will
> move to Element in the dom-parsing spec, and then would apply to mathml
> elements.
> Is that understanding wrong?
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11204#c13

I agree this is something we want to do, but it isn't in the HTML spec 
and, IMO, shouldn't be tested in its test suite. I'll make sure that it 
is tested when we start work on a test suite for the DOM Parsing and 
Serialization spec.

Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 11:13:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:29 UTC