W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-testsuite@w3.org > September 2010

Re: HTML Testing Task Force Conf Call Agenda 9/21/2010

From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:17:11 +0200
Message-ID: <4C987817.1070207@opera.com>
To: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
CC: "'public-html-testsuite@w3.org'" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>, "Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk> (pjt47@cam.ac.uk)" <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
On 09/21/2010 03:07 AM, Kris Krueger wrote:

> Canvas Tests with Bugs
> #1 http://test.w3.org/html/tests/submission/PhilipTaylor/canvas/toDataURL.jpeg.quality.basic.html
>
> This test uses a tolerance for pass/fail.
> The spec doesn't guarantee that the pixel array from toDataURL will match across lossless images.

You mean lossy images, right? I'm not sure exactly what your bug report 
is. You think we can't have tests that check for approximate values, or 
something else?

> #2 http://test.w3.org/html/tests/submission/PhilipTaylor/canvas/toDataURL.jpeg.quality.basic.html
>
> '0.01' should be valid input.
> Canvas Spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/the-canvas-element.html)
> "For the purposes of these rules, an argument is considered to be a number if it is converted to
> an IDL double value by the rules for handling arguments of type any in the Web IDL specification.
> [WEBIDL]".

Is this the right URL for this test? I can't see the problem you allude 
to here.
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 09:17:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 September 2010 09:17:50 GMT