W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-testsuite@w3.org > August 2010

Re: getElementsByClassName approval/feedback request

From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:27:56 +0200
Message-ID: <4C58357C.6090608@opera.com>
To: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
CC: "'public-html-testsuite@w3.org' (public-html-testsuite@w3.org)" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>
On 07/22/2010 04:21 AM, Kris Krueger wrote:
> Microsoft created and submitted tests for ‘getElementsByClassName’ as we
> have been developing IE9.
>
> I’d like to have these tests approved, if you think that they are wrong
> per the spec please provide feedback.
>
> http://test.w3.org/html/tests/submission/Microsoft/apis/

We just submitted some getElementsByClassName tests in 
http://test.w3.org/html/tests/submission/Opera/getElementsByClassName/

As a side point, if there are generic files that we expect to be reused 
across multiple tests, it would be nice to have a generic place to put 
them so that they end up in the same place in submitted/ and approved/ 
and we don't end up with multiple copies of the same file scattered 
about the place.

Also, I added a empty testharnessreport.js file. The idea is that we 
could use this for test runner integration and browser vendors can use 
it to interface with whatever systems they have for running tests. I 
suppose it is also possible to insist that all tests run in an iframe, 
but this could be difficult if we want to test the behaviour of 
window.top for example. Having said that I don't really know how to 
automate running the tests in an entirely transparent way, so maybe an 
iframe is enough and this is unneeded. Thoughts?
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2010 15:28:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 August 2010 15:28:41 GMT