- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 18:14:51 -0700
- To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Cc: "Jerry Smith (IEP)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com>, "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
On 05/12/2016 06:10 PM, Mark Watson wrote: > > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org > <mailto:plh@w3.org>> wrote: > > > > On 05/12/2016 05:25 PM, Jerry Smith (IEP) wrote: > > We all create a branch for each PR so that subsequent commits > are isolated to the issue they are working. > > > Yes, of course. > > Is it okay to rebase in these (git rebase gh-pages)? > > > Not sure what you mean here. In my proposal, the history of commits > is maintained on the master branch and the gh-pages branch only > contains the automatically generated draft, so no need to rebase > anything there. > > Having said that, such change at the moment could be disruptive to > you folks so I'd rather not touch the branches until you folks want > me to squash btw. Just give me the word and I'll do it. > > > We are treating gh-pages as our master branch (at the moment). We have > no branch called "master". Yep, I'm aware of that. I sense that I'm creating more confusion than actually helping here. So forget my proposal for now. I could always come back to it later when you guys have less pressure and I could express myself more clearly. Philippe
Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 01:14:55 UTC