Re: Formal objection to Encrypted Media Extensions progressing to Proposed Recommendation without greater user protection from Adri S. on 2016-08-16 (public-html-media@w3.org from August 2016)

From: Adri S. <adrian86@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:20:50 -0300
To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAFkC+hdxov5=yUiUFxmExLD=Hg5WUNT+Q02Sxf5TppZMJHnL=w@mail.gmail.com>

Hello, I agree with the objection put up by ruben and I'd like to ask the
W3C: Why would anyone want DRM instead of FREEDOM if not for MONEY??

I know, meh sounds like a troll with this sort of flame-question. Honestly,
I don't understand WHY. I thought the W3C defended the web for us (people)
and not US (corporations).

Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2016 21:21:58 UTC