- From: ddorwin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 01:00:26 +0000
- To: public-html-media@w3.org
ddorwin has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media: == Explicitly state "RFC words" should be interpreted per RFC2119 == The spec uses RFC2119 words MUST, MUST NOT, etc., and they are differentiated by ReSpec, but we do not reference RFC2119. We should explicitly document their interpretation like other specs do. Examples: * https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/infrastructure.html#conformance-requirements * https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-secure-contexts/#conventions As an aside, this seems like something ReSpec should insert automatically along with the formatting. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/issues/162 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2016 01:00:28 UTC