W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > April 2015

Re: [whatwg] Fetch, MSE, and MIX

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:12:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78hvNKqfs-aef4vEb=qxtTynv9gKXxxie1EYHgsOcd4O3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Matthew Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com>, WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>, Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com>
I removed some people from the cc. The WHATWG list seems to bite.

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote:
> I think as we look to
> provide a compelling story for EME over wholly-proprietary (... rather than
> partially-proprietary) solutions, or look to improve the user experience in
> streaming video with MSE vs the <video> tag, this is still very much needed.

Okay, so accepting that for the moment, that leaves us with deciding
on the appropriate API on the MSE side. I don't have a strong
preference, but at this point MSE is the only case I can think of that
warrants an explicit opaque readable stream class. All the other use
cases I have (such as feeding <img> or <script> an arbitrary response)
would rather have a Response instance so headers and such are
preserved. And that Response can be opaque of course and then (as
currently specified) its .body would return null, but these privileged
contexts would get access to the underlying body stream.

I don't particularly mind introducing an opaque readable stream class,
but do we have any other use cases besides MSE?


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 17:12:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 16 April 2015 17:12:44 UTC