RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

I have been removed from the list too, I've received a message saying I'm
not authorized to send messages, and also hope this have been accidental.
Maybe that has some relationship with the fact I have been not receiving
messages from this list since last week?
El 30/05/2013 16:01, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> escribió:

> > I've just been removed from this list.
>
> I will take this problem offline to discuss with Gael and the W3C Team.
>
> /paulc
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gaël Pegliasco [mailto:gael@pegliasco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:54 AM
> To: Ronane
> Cc: Florian Bösch; Andreas Kuckartz; Sam Ruby; timbl@w3.org;
> public-html-admin@w3.org; <public-html-media@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish
> Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft
> (FPWD)
>
> I've just been removed from this list.
>
> I hope this is "accidental" as it would not be very fair-play to
> automatically unsubscribe people writing objections to EME...
>
> Best regards,
>
> GaËl,
>
> Le 30/05/2013 15:40, Gaël Pegliasco a écrit :
> > Le 30/05/2013 11:12, Ronane a écrit :
> >> I agree as well.
> >> I think that w3c has for now legitimation to develop the standards of
> >> web but it would lose it if it try to add EME into the web.
> >>
> >>
> > I agree with that point.
> > This legitimation is acquired because we all agree with W3C Open
> > Standard and accept to follow these rules defined in the most open way.
> >
> > But like any other open source project, W3C can be forked if it choose
> > to go on closed way.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Gaël,
> >
>
>
>