Re: [Bug 22329] New: [MSE] TextTrack attributes settable in conflict with the html spec

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 12, 2013, at 12:35 AM, Wayne Borean <wborean@gmail.com> wrote:


Hmm. You do realize that EME is not compatible with the WIPO Internet
Treaties?


Is your comment related to the thread in which you posted it (which is
about MSE not EME) ? Can you explain further ?

...Mark


While a private firm like Microsoft or Apple could (and do) build software
which isn't WIPO-1995 compliant, making a Web Standard that isn't WIPO-1995
compliant would be a huge mistake.

Wayne



On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:02 PM,
<bugzilla@jessica.w3.org<bugzilla@jessica.w3..org>
> wrote:

> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22329
>
>             Bug ID: 22329
>            Summary: [MSE] TextTrack attributes settable in conflict with
>                     the html spec
>     Classification: Unclassified
>            Product: HTML WG
>            Version: unspecified
>           Hardware: PC
>                 OS: All
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P2
>          Component: Media Source Extensions
>           Assignee: adrianba@microsoft.com
>           Reporter: giles@mozilla.com
>         QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
>                 CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-media@w3.org
>
> "partial interface TextTrack {
>   attribute DOMString kind;
>   attribute DOMString language;
> }"
>
> The TextTrack interface in the html spec has readonly attributes of the
> same
> name. I think the idea is to use specific constructors as the only way to
> pass
> these in, or have them created by the parser for in-band text tracks and
> <track> elements.
>
> Do we need this interface? If it's muxed with the parent media element's
> source
> stream, the in-band text track support should cover it, and if it's
> external,
> the media.AddTextTrack and TextTrack.addCue methods should be sufficient to
> implement dynamic subtitles with minimal complexity.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 14:31:43 UTC