RE: Chromebook DRM specification

The link provided by Florian resolves to the Encrypted Media Extensions, and
not some mythical, FUD inducing HTML-DRM. Perhaps Florian would be best
served reading the following: 


“W3C is not developing a new DRM system, nor are we embracing DRM as an
organization.”
http://www.w3.org/QA/2013/03/drm_and_the_open_web.html

 

JF

 

From: Florian Bösch [mailto:pyalot@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 9:59 AM
To: Glenn Adams
Cc: Mark Watson; Paul Cotton; Mays, David; David Dorwin;
<public-html-media@w3.org>; Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org); Michael(tm)
Smith (mike@w3.org)
Subject: Re: Chromebook DRM specification

 

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

Why do I get the strong sense that you haven't tried doing any of these
things?

You are free to point out a specification that'd allow me to do so.

 

Also, why do you keep using the term "HTML-DRM" when you know very well that
there is no such a thing?

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-med
ia.html