W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [MSE] Timestamp offset mechanism

From: Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:31:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA0c1bAq=zbPMMDPYG0WY7WF2rF7ow_t9Sz23oFyt=TuVKO6vQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kevin Streeter <kstreete@adobe.com>
Cc: Steven Robertson <strobe@google.com>, "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
comments inline...

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Kevin Streeter <kstreete@adobe.com> wrote:

> I also prefer sourceTimestampOffset().
> In response to Steve's question on lifetime, I would vote for keeping the
> setting in place until explicitly reset.  This will make it easy to push
> several segments of spliced content into the timeline.  I think that with
> the semantics Aaron described simply setting the offset to '0' will do the
> job.

[acolwell] Yes the intent was for the offset to stay in effect until set to
a new value. I should have made the text a little more explicit on this
Received on Monday, 18 June 2012 19:31:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:56 UTC