W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > June 2012

[EME] object-oriented design representing sessions as objects

From: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:58:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHD2rsjHp9vrS0ycAxD8YA0=-cPiWPQxtWnqOk+VKd2FpoB+cw@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html-media@w3.org
[This is the most important open Encrypted Media Extensions bug because so
many other bugs depend on or are affected by the potential use of objects.]

One of the open issues in the proposal is whether to have a more
object-oriented API that has the same functionality but represents key
exchange 'sessions' as objects. In this variant, most of the methods,
properties, and events would be on this object rather than
the HTMLMediaElement. An potential design is shown at
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html#issue-oo-api-design
.

The issue is tracked in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16613.
We'd like to have some discussion on this topic and make a decision so we
can move forward on the bugs that depend on this decision.

Below is my evaluation of the potential change from comment 4 in the bug.
Please comment on, add to it, and/or provide other feedback. There seem to
be a lot of advantages, and the main disadvantages are seem to be potential
extra work for implementations and possible separation of every initData
into a separate object.

Advantages of the object-oriented approach:
 * Clearly defines the lifetime of a session. (See also 16547.)
 * keySystem and sessionId do not need to be passed around - they are always
properties.
 * We might be able to eliminate cancel[KeyRequest]().
 * Minimal changes to the HTMLMediaElement interface and better
encapsulation
of this functionality.
 * May allow sharing of keys between multiple elements if the object can be
associated with additional elements. (See also bug 17202.)
 * Might allow us to use properties on the object with simple events
instead of
using complex events.
 * Addresses at least some aspects of bug bug 16547, bug 16548, bug 16550,
bug
16612, bug 16614, 16615, bug 17199, bug 17202, bug 17203 <see the bug for
titles and links>

Disadvantages:
 * Additional complexity for implementations?
   - Association of sessions with elements _might_ be more difficult.
   - Another IDL, and implementation.
     * For WebKit, we currently just add some methods on the existing media
element stack. A new element would require implementing a new stack to get
to
the embedder.
 * Additional complexity for applications?
 * If we tie the generateKeyRequest() functionality to this object, each new
license (and every unique init_data) would create a new object. This could
apply to relatively simple cases, such as separate files (and keys) for
audio
and video. (In the existing proposal, a separate session ID would be
created,
but all interaction would be through the same object - the
HTMLMediaElement.)

TBD:
 * The impact of firing events at the new object instead of the
HTMLMediaElement on applications.
 * It would be nice to have some input on what might be preferable from an
application developer POV.
 * Whether Media Source will move in a similar direction - consistency
would be
nice. See bug 17082.
 * Should new objects be automatically associated with a media element?
Should
there be some "static" creation method (or just new "MediaKeySession") that
provides an object that can be added to an HTMLMediaElement. This would be
similar to xxxTracks as discussed in bug 17082 comment 4.
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 04:59:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:55 UTC