Re: Korean should default to word-break: keep-all or not?

I am sorry.
A whole sentence was not read, written different conclusion.
Generally, the balance of a line is important.
therefore, a default value - word-break:keep-all; - it is not suit.
/* Korean prefers to break only at spaces */
:root:lang(ko) {
    word-break: keep-all;
}

word-break:break-all is more suit.
:root:lang(ko) {
    word-break: break-all;
}



2012/5/5 ±è¿µº¸ <tonextday@gmail.com>

> Hello.
> My name is YoungBo Kim.
> I agree your opinion bellow.
> "Years ago I was told from my Korean colleague that Korean line breaking
> rules should be the same as English and CJ rules should not apply"
>
> Korean language - Hanguel, space is not used line breaking. Space is
> inserted in order to classify the meaning of a character. It is clear that
> the purpose and a function differ from space used by CJ.
> It differs from using space, in order to change into Kanji.
>
> I don't test bellow style rules.
> /* Korean prefers to break only at spaces */
> :root:lang(ko) {
> word-break: keep-all;
> }
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2012/5/5 Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk73@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi. Koji.
>> Thanks for email.
>>
>> 2012/5/5 Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Can someone please help me to figure out an issue in CSS Text Level 3?
>> >
>> > The current CSS Text Level 3 has informative appendix for the default
>> UA stylesheet[1], which contains:
>> >
>> > /* Korean prefers to break only at spaces */
>> > :root:lang(ko) {
>> >  word-break: keep-all;
>> > }
>> >
>> > The "word-break: keep-all"[2] disallows breaking between CJK characters
>> and make line breaking rules just like English. Years ago I was told from
>> my Korean colleague that Korean line breaking rules should be the same as
>> English and CJ rules should not apply, so we put this. But Example 3 of
>> UAX#14, 8.2 Examples of Customization[3] says:
>> >
>> >> Depending on the nature of the document, Korean either uses implicit
>> >> breaking around characters Space-based layout is common in magazines
>> >> and other informal documents with ragged margins, while books, with
>> >> both margins justified, use the other type, as it affords more line
>> break
>> >> opportunities and therefore leads to better justification.
>> >
>> > If this behavior depends on documents, and most sites do not use
>> "word-break: keep-all" today (as far as I observed quickly,) I guess it's
>> probably wrong to put "word-break: keep-all" into the UA default stylesheet.
>> >
>> > I proposed removal of this to the www-style[4], but could someone
>> please confirm if my understanding is correct?
>>
>> Frankly I am not expert in this domain. So after got your email, I
>> closely looked at physical things like a Korean book, newspaper and
>> magazine. But all of these I checked doesn't seems to use word
>> separators and other explicit break opportunities.
>>
>> Therefore I would like to see other opinions from experts of Korean
>> Interest Group.
>>
>> best regards,
>> Wonsuk.
>>
>>
>> > Thank you for your support in advance.
>> >
>> > [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#default-stylesheet
>> > [2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#word-break
>> > [3] http://unicode.org/reports/tr14/#Examples
>> > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0132.html
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Koji
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> =========================================
>> ÀÌ ¿ø ¼® (Wonsuk, Lee) / Principal Engineer, Ph.D
>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Co., LTD. (ß²àøï³í­)
>> Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997
>> E-mail: wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com, wonsuk73@gmail.com
>> http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
>> -----------------------------------------
>> Inspire the World, Create the Future !!!
>> =========================================
>>
>>
>

Received on Saturday, 5 May 2012 19:18:36 UTC