W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-diffs@w3.org > February 2010

mjs: Record counter-proposal and call for alternate proposals for ISSUE-4 and ISSUE-84.

From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:54:48 +0900 (JST)
To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
Message-Id: <20100224015448.BEB062BC1F@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
mjs: Record counter-proposal and call for alternate proposals for
ISSUE-4 and ISSUE-84.

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/status/issue-status.html?r1=1.80&r2=1.81&f=h

===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/status/issue-status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.80
retrieving revision 1.81
diff -u -d -r1.80 -r1.81
--- issue-status.html	24 Feb 2010 01:23:43 -0000	1.80
+++ issue-status.html	24 Feb 2010 01:54:31 -0000	1.81
@@ -54,12 +54,12 @@
 <tr><td id="ISSUE-004"><a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/4">ISSUE-4</a>
 html-versioning <a href="#ISSUE-004" title="Link to this entry">#</a></td>
     <td>none</td>
-    <td><a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/172">ACTION-172: Revise Change Proposal</a></td>        
-    <td><time datetime="2010-02-18">Feb 18, 2010</time></td>
-    <td>Larry Masinter</td>
+    <td>Volunteer to write Alternate/Counter-Proposals</td>
+    <td><time datetime="2010-03-30">Mar 30, 2010</time></td>
+    <td>Working Group</td>
     <td><strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0015.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Allow much more general DOCTYPE syntax to be conforming, possibly including optional version information.</a></strong><br>
         (Same Change Proposal also covers ISSUE-84)<br>
-        Comments addressed.
+        <strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0718.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Do not put a version indicator in the DOCTYPE.<a></strong>
     </td>
 </tr>
 
@@ -376,15 +376,16 @@
 <tr><td id="ISSUE-084"><a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/84">ISSUE-84</a>
 legacy-doctypes <a href="#ISSUE-084" title="Link to this entry">#</a></td>
     <td><a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7727">bug&nbsp;7727</a></td>
-    <td><a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/172">ACTION-172: Revise Change Proposal</a></td>        
-    <td><time datetime="2010-02-18">Feb 18, 2010</time></td>
-    <td>Larry Masinter</td>
-    <td><strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0000.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Allow much more general DOCTYPE syntax to be conforming, possibly including optional version information..</a></strong><br>
+    <td>Volunteer to write Alternate/Counter-Proposals</td>
+    <td><time datetime="2010-03-30">Mar 40, 2010</time></td>
+    <td>Working Group</td>
+    <td><strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0000.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Allow much more general DOCTYPE syntax to be conforming, possibly including optional version information.</a></strong><br>
         (Same Change Proposal also covers ISSUE-4)<br>
         Request for <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0032.html">revision to satisfy Change Proposal requirements.</a><br>
         Further update to <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0054.html">add details</a> and <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0055.html">still more</a>.<br>
         Further review comments <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0236.html">here</a><br>
-        Comments addressed.
+        Comments addressed.<br>
+        <strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0718.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Do not put a version indicator in the DOCTYPE.<a></strong>
         </td>
 </tr>
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 01:55:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 06:14:17 GMT