- From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:38:05 +0900 (JST)
- To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
: Fixed a number of issues that Shane McCarron had with the HTML5+RDFa text. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/rdfa/Overview.html?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&f=h =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/rdfa/source,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -d -r1.2 -r1.3 --- source 12 Jul 2009 20:19:05 -0000 1.2 +++ source 12 Jul 2009 22:37:42 -0000 1.3 @@ -43,26 +43,25 @@ <p> Starting in 2006, the Semantic Web Deployment Work Group began work to develop a technology to express semantic data in - XHTML 1.1. This technology was successfully developed and is now + XHTML. This technology was successfully developed and is now called RDFa (The Resource Description Framework in Attributes). While HTML provides a mechanism to express the structure of a document (title, paragraphs, links), RDFa provides a mechanism to express the meaning of a document (people, places, events). <p> <p> - The document, titled "RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing Rules" + The document, titled "RDF in XHTML: Syntax and Processing" [<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/">XHTML+RDFa</a>], defined a set of attributes and rules for processing those attributes that resulted in the output of machine-readable semantic data. While the - document was specific to the XHTML 1.1 member in the HTML family, the - attributes and rules were always intended to operate across any - tree-based structure containing attributes on tree nodes (such as HTML4, - SVG and ODF). + document applied to XHTML, the attributes and rules were always + intended to operate across any tree-based structure containing attributes + on tree nodes (such as HTML4, SVG and ODF). </p> <p> - While RDFa was initially specified for use in XHTML 1.1, adoption by + While RDFa was initially specified for use in XHTML, adoption by a number of large organizations on the Web spurred RDFa's use in non-XHTML - languages. Its use in HTML4 and HTML5, before an official specification + languages. Its use in HTML4, before an official specification was developed for those languages, caused concern regarding document conformance. </p> @@ -345,7 +344,84 @@ If a prefix mapping is not found for text that is given to the CURIE processing algorithm, and the text is an Internationalized Resource Identifier as defined in - [<a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987">IRI</a>], then the expanded - value of the potential CURIE should be the IRI. - </pre> + [<a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987">IRI</a>], and the scheme is + one of the allowable scheme values in the section below, then the expanded + value of the potential CURIE should be the IRI. + </p> + <h5>Allowable CURIE Scheme values</h5> + <p> + <em>This section is informative.</em> + </p> + <p> + Each of these listed values is a + [<a href="http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html">registered IANA Scheme</a>] + with a corresponding RFC: + </p> + <p> +aaa +aaas +acap +cap +cid +crid +data +dav +dict +dns +fax +file +ftp +go +gopher +h323 +http +https +iax +icap +im +imap +info +ipp +iris +iris.beep +iris.xpc +iris.xpcs +iris.lwz +ldap +mailto +mid +modem +msrp +msrps +mtqp +mupdate +news +nfs +nntp +opaquelocktoken +pop +pres +rtsp +service +shttp +sieve +sip +sips +snmp +soap.beep +soap.beeps +tag +tel +telnet +tftp +thismessage +tip +tv +urn +vemmi +xmlrpc.beep +xmlrpc.beeps +xmpp +z39.50r +z39.50s </p> Index: Overview.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/rdfa/Overview.html,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -d -r1.2 -r1.3 --- Overview.html 12 Jul 2009 20:19:04 -0000 1.2 +++ Overview.html 12 Jul 2009 22:37:42 -0000 1.3 @@ -1091,7 +1091,9 @@ <li><a href=#invalid-xmlliteral-values><span class=secno>5.5.2 </span>Invalid XMLLiteral values</a></li> <li><a href=#the-xmlns:-attribute><span class=secno>5.5.3 </span>The <code>xmlns:</code> attribute</a></li> <li><a href=#the-token-attribute><span class=secno>5.5.4 </span>The <code>token</code> attribute</a></li> - <li><a href=#use-of-uris-in-curie-only-attribute-values><span class=secno>5.5.5 </span>Use of URIs in CURIE-only attribute values</a></li></ol></li></ol></li> + <li><a href=#use-of-uris-in-curie-only-attribute-values><span class=secno>5.5.5 </span>Use of URIs in CURIE-only attribute values</a> + <ol class=toc> + <li><a href=#allowable-curie-scheme-values><span class=secno>5.5.5.1 </span>Allowable CURIE Scheme values</a></li></ol></li></ol></li></ol></li> <li><a href=#microdata><span class=secno>6 </span>Microdata</a> <ol class=toc> <li><a href=#introduction-3><span class=secno>6.1 </span>Introduction</a> @@ -86285,26 +86287,25 @@ <p> Starting in 2006, the Semantic Web Deployment Work Group began work to develop a technology to express semantic data in - XHTML 1.1. This technology was successfully developed and is now + XHTML. This technology was successfully developed and is now called RDFa (The Resource Description Framework in Attributes). While HTML provides a mechanism to express the structure of a document (title, paragraphs, links), RDFa provides a mechanism to express the meaning of a document (people, places, events). </p><p> </p><p> - The document, titled "RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing Rules" + The document, titled "RDF in XHTML: Syntax and Processing" [<a href=http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/>XHTML+RDFa</a>], defined a set of attributes and rules for processing those attributes that resulted in the output of machine-readable semantic data. While the - document was specific to the XHTML 1.1 member in the HTML family, the - attributes and rules were always intended to operate across any - tree-based structure containing attributes on tree nodes (such as HTML4, - SVG and ODF). + document applied to XHTML, the attributes and rules were always + intended to operate across any tree-based structure containing attributes + on tree nodes (such as HTML4, SVG and ODF). </p> <p> - While RDFa was initially specified for use in XHTML 1.1, adoption by + While RDFa was initially specified for use in XHTML, adoption by a number of large organizations on the Web spurred RDFa's use in non-XHTML - languages. Its use in HTML4 and HTML5, before an official specification + languages. Its use in HTML4, before an official specification was developed for those languages, caused concern regarding document conformance. </p> @@ -86581,9 +86582,86 @@ If a prefix mapping is not found for text that is given to the CURIE processing algorithm, and the text is an Internationalized Resource Identifier as defined in - [<a href=http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987>IRI</a>], then the expanded - value of the potential CURIE should be the IRI. - + [<a href=http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987>IRI</a>], and the scheme is + one of the allowable scheme values in the section below, then the expanded + value of the potential CURIE should be the IRI. + </p> + <h5 id=allowable-curie-scheme-values><span class=secno>5.5.5.1 </span>Allowable CURIE Scheme values</h5> + <p> + <em>This section is informative.</em> + </p> + <p> + Each of these listed values is a + [<a href=http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html>registered IANA Scheme</a>] + with a corresponding RFC: + </p> + <p> +aaa +aaas +acap +cap +cid +crid +data +dav +dict +dns +fax +file +ftp +go +gopher +h323 +http +https +iax +icap +im +imap +info +ipp +iris +iris.beep +iris.xpc +iris.xpcs +iris.lwz +ldap +mailto +mid +modem +msrp +msrps +mtqp +mupdate +news +nfs +nntp +opaquelocktoken +pop +pres +rtsp +service +shttp +sieve +sip +sips +snmp +soap.beep +soap.beeps +tag +tel +telnet +tftp +thismessage +tip +tv +urn +vemmi +xmlrpc.beep +xmlrpc.beeps +xmpp +z39.50r +z39.50s </p> <h2 id=microdata><span class=secno>6 </span><dfn>Microdata</dfn></h2> Index: rdfa-module.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/rdfa/rdfa-module.html,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -d -r1.4 -r1.5 --- rdfa-module.html 12 Jul 2009 20:19:05 -0000 1.4 +++ rdfa-module.html 12 Jul 2009 22:37:42 -0000 1.5 @@ -245,11 +245,11 @@ Abstract </h2> <p> - This specification defines rules and guidelines for adapting the RDF - in XHTML 1.1 specification (RDFa) for use in the HTML5 and XHTML5 members - of the HTML family. The rules defined in this document not only apply - to HTML5 documents, but also to HTML4 documents interpreted through the - HTML5 parsing rules. + This specification defines rules and guidelines for adapting the + RDF in XHTML: Syntax and Processing (RDFa) specification for use in the + HTML5 and XHTML5 members of the HTML family. The rules defined in this + document not only apply to HTML5 documents, but also to HTML4 documents + interpreted through the HTML5 parsing rules. </p> <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=status-of-this-document> Status of this document @@ -359,26 +359,25 @@ <p> Starting in 2006, the Semantic Web Deployment Work Group began work to develop a technology to express semantic data in - XHTML 1.1. This technology was successfully developed and is now + XHTML. This technology was successfully developed and is now called RDFa (The Resource Description Framework in Attributes). While HTML provides a mechanism to express the structure of a document (title, paragraphs, links), RDFa provides a mechanism to express the meaning of a document (people, places, events). </p><p> </p><p> - The document, titled "RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing Rules" + The document, titled "RDF in XHTML: Syntax and Processing" [<a href=http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/>XHTML+RDFa</a>], defined a set of attributes and rules for processing those attributes that resulted in the output of machine-readable semantic data. While the - document was specific to the XHTML 1.1 member in the HTML family, the - attributes and rules were always intended to operate across any - tree-based structure containing attributes on tree nodes (such as HTML4, - SVG and ODF). + document applied to XHTML, the attributes and rules were always + intended to operate across any tree-based structure containing attributes + on tree nodes (such as HTML4, SVG and ODF). </p> <p> - While RDFa was initially specified for use in XHTML 1.1, adoption by + While RDFa was initially specified for use in XHTML, adoption by a number of large organizations on the Web spurred RDFa's use in non-XHTML - languages. Its use in HTML4 and HTML5, before an official specification + languages. Its use in HTML4, before an official specification was developed for those languages, caused concern regarding document conformance. </p> @@ -655,8 +654,85 @@ If a prefix mapping is not found for text that is given to the CURIE processing algorithm, and the text is an Internationalized Resource Identifier as defined in - [<a href=http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987>IRI</a>], then the expanded - value of the potential CURIE should be the IRI. - + [<a href=http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987>IRI</a>], and the scheme is + one of the allowable scheme values in the section below, then the expanded + value of the potential CURIE should be the IRI. + </p> + <h5 id=allowable-curie-scheme-values><span class=secno>1.5.5.1 </span>Allowable CURIE Scheme values</h5> + <p> + <em>This section is informative.</em> + </p> + <p> + Each of these listed values is a + [<a href=http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html>registered IANA Scheme</a>] + with a corresponding RFC: + </p> + <p> +aaa +aaas +acap +cap +cid +crid +data +dav +dict +dns +fax +file +ftp +go +gopher +h323 +http +https +iax +icap +im +imap +info +ipp +iris +iris.beep +iris.xpc +iris.xpcs +iris.lwz +ldap +mailto +mid +modem +msrp +msrps +mtqp +mupdate +news +nfs +nntp +opaquelocktoken +pop +pres +rtsp +service +shttp +sieve +sip +sips +snmp +soap.beep +soap.beeps +tag +tel +telnet +tftp +thismessage +tip +tv +urn +vemmi +xmlrpc.beep +xmlrpc.beeps +xmpp +z39.50r +z39.50s </p> </body></html> \ No newline at end of file
Received on Sunday, 12 July 2009 22:38:58 UTC