W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-diffs@w3.org > August 2009

hixie: Tidy up the database spec. Leave a big scary placeholder for defining the Web SQL dialect. (whatwg r3655)

From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:19:31 +0900 (JST)
To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
Message-Id: <20090818051931.B36422BC29@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
hixie: Tidy up the database spec. Leave a big scary placeholder for
defining the Web SQL dialect. (whatwg r3655)

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/webstorage/Overview.html?r1=1.65&r2=1.66&f=h
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=3654&to=3655

===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/webstorage/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.65
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -d -r1.65 -r1.66
--- Overview.html	17 Aug 2009 23:01:55 -0000	1.65
+++ Overview.html	18 Aug 2009 05:19:13 -0000	1.66
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
    <h1>Web Storage</h1>
    <!--ZZZ:-->
    <!--<h2 class="no-num no-toc">W3C Working Draft 23 April 2009</h2>-->
-   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="editor-s-draft-date-1-january-1970">Editor's Draft 17 August 2009</h2>
+   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="editor-s-draft-date-1-january-1970">Editor's Draft 18 August 2009</h2>
    <!--:ZZZ-->
    <dl><!-- ZZZ: update the month/day (twice), (un)comment out
     <dt>This Version:</dt>
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
   specification's progress along the W3C Recommendation track.
   <!--ZZZ:-->
   <!--This specification is the 23 April 2009 Working Draft.-->
-  This specification is the 17 August 2009 Editor's Draft.
+  This specification is the 18 August 2009 Editor's Draft.
   <!--:ZZZ-->
   </p><!-- required patent boilerplate --><p>This document was produced by a group operating under the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/">5
   February 2004 W3C Patent Policy</a>. W3C maintains a <a href="http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/42538/status" rel="disclosure">public list of
@@ -671,9 +671,8 @@
 
     <p>However, this also puts the user's data at risk.</p>
 
-    <!-- XXX should there be an explicit way for sites to state when
-    data should expire? as in
-    localStorage.expireData(365); ? -->
+    <!--v2 consider adding an explicit way for sites to state when
+    data should expire, as in  localStorage.expireData(365); -->
 
    </dd>
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:20:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 06:14:09 GMT