W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-data-tf@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Updated Microdata to RDF draft

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:25:08 -0400
To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
CC: HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6FA66320-355D-48FE-8980-4B5D64AA4262@kellogg-assoc.com>
On Oct 29, 2011, at 2:02 AM, "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:

> Gregg,
> A quick thing for your next revision to the microdata RDF spec: Hixie has resolved the issue on replacing <time> with <data> [1] and made the relevant changes in the spec [2]. The new <data> element has a value attribute which is used to provide the relevant microdata property value [3].

Looking at the diffs, it is clear that @value is intended for typed data, and that lexical scanning might be in order. I believe Hixie would reject this and say that the vocabulary must define the types and be explicitly supported by a processor, but for generic transformation this is not feasible.

If we do lexical scanning, what set of datatypes is appropriate? Thoughts?


> Jeni
> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13240#c47
> [2] http://html5.org/r/6783
> [3] http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/Overview.html#values
> -- 
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2011 15:25:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:05 UTC