W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-data-tf@w3.org > October 2011

Re-use of RDFa attributes to address some of the issues?

From: Benjamin Nowack <bn@kasabi.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:03:50 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA1A5F6.4000608@kasabi.com>
To: public-html-data-tf@w3.org
Hi,

Looking at the influence angles this TF has on RDFa vs. MD editors, I 
wonder if it might be worth looking in the other direction, too, to 
check if some of RDFa's features could be directly applied to MD if 
certain criteria are met. (This could even be interesting for the RDFa 
community, marketing-wise).

To give some examples:

   * MD doesn't support multi-type items.
     * Current solution/workaround: Use the rdf:type URI in an @itemprop.
     * Feature request: Authors targeting MD/RDF parsers should have a
       more convenient syntax for this.
     * Potential approach: Use RDFa's @typeof on itemscope'd node. (TF
       would have to investigate/document potential compatibility issues
       with RDFa 1.1.)

   * As a W3C TF, we cannot safely propose an algorithm to generate
     typical RDF predicate URIs from short property names and unknown
     itemtypes, due to potential "Namespace squatting", no matter how
     smart our URI generation mechanism may be.
     * Current W3C/RDF-compliant solution/workaround: For RDF triples to
       be generated, you have to always use URIs in @itemprop, unless
       the itemtype is from a "well-known" RDF vocabulary/namespace and
       somehow supported by the targeted MD/RDF parser.
     * Feature request: Authors (or vocabulary maintainers?) should be
       able to declare a target URI space for their MD markup and/or
       MD/RDF parsers should be able to safely generate predicate URIs
       without prior knowledge about the itemtype encountered.
     * Potential approach: Use RDFa's @vocab to define an RDF target
       namespace.

   * RDF generated from pure MD cannot have datatyped literals
     (including markup).
     * Current solution: None
     * Feature request: Authors (or vocabulary maintainers?) should be
       able to declare datatypes or hints for markup preservation.
     * Potential existing solution: Use RDFa's @vocab to point at a
       formal description of the intended datatypes (would need network
       access). Or use RDFa's @datatype.

If there are none of these "RDF interpretation allowed" triggers, a 
parser would simply stay in the MD-restricted model.


Just an idea while we're dancing on opinion minefields ;-)
Benji




-- 
Benjamin Nowack
Software Engineer, Kasabi, Talis Systems Ltd

http://kasabi.com/
http://twitter.com/bengee
http://bnode.org/

Talis Systems Ltd is registered in England and Wales as 07196440.
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 17:04:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 October 2011 17:04:23 GMT