- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:48:50 +0200
- To: public-html-data-tf@w3.org
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:33:47 +0200, Lin Clark <lin.w.clark@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Philip Jägenstedt > <philipj@opera.com>wrote: >> >> >> itemref is not only for shared properties, arguably the more important >> use >> case is for when the data is not all in a single subtree, e.g. as in >> http://www.2gc.co.uk/a2gc-**people <http://www.2gc.co.uk/a2gc-people> >> >> Given that it's useful and implemented in both content (previous link) >> and >> implementations (Opera), why would we consider dropping it? >> >> > If I'm not mistaken, they aren't talking about dropping it in microdata > but > instead are talking about not implementing it in RDFa... and in the case > of > properties not being in the same subtree in RDFa, the same 'about' value > can > be used to associate properties from two subtrees with the same subject. Oh, OK :) -- Philip Jägenstedt Core Developer Opera Software
Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 10:49:29 UTC