W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-data-tf@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)

From: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:32:33 +0900
Message-ID: <CAHQ1n3DzOqi_tt7_iG7gF+b2gnbs1AHzW++eJ7dxTMtZboMy+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Cc: "public-html-data-tf@w3.org" <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
Hello Gregg,

2011/10/14 Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>:
>  Note, on a separate list [7] that mfhepp worried about the use of collections at all, as that does not allow appropriate Good Relations mappings. We really need to solicit more input on the whole notion of preserving order through collections when deriving RDF from Microdata.

I agree with mfhepp, that mapping to RDF Collection doesn't seem to be
good idea.

Most RDF models do not expect collection for multiple values. For
example, when a bibliography page has multiple subjects, generating
rdf:List as object of dc:subject would upset librarians. Same for
tags, skos:altLabels, etc.

Also, most RDF properties do not have rdf:List as their range, thus
generating collection would result in non conforming (or
contradicting) triples.

cheers,

-- 
@prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name
"KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"].
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2011 01:33:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 October 2011 01:33:11 GMT