W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-data-tf@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Draft Note for HTML WG

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:58:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFNgM+ZEPdssm3arxSRWE8KaQ4b=waAtOo_eRatCZJd45QRBmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
On 14 November 2011 10:04, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> - I think the 'typing' issue is still unresolved. I continue to believe that allowing multiple types in microdata, either within itemtype or with a different microdata attribute, would be important, and any other solution (eg, schema.org/type) is just a hack. I realize that there is a stiff opposition to this, but it merits a line in the report.
> - is it worth referring to RDFa Lite?

Yes, multiple types came up a few times at the Schema.org workshop as
something that aids decentralisation, vocab mixing and richer
description...

Dan
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 09:59:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 14 November 2011 09:59:15 GMT