W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-commits@w3.org > May 2011

html5/decision-policy decision-policy-v2.html,1.28,1.29

From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 22:30:19 +0000
To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QRAyZ-0006kp-71@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv25885

Modified Files:
	decision-policy-v2.html 
Log Message:
Fix trivial markup errors in latest revision.


Index: decision-policy-v2.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -d -r1.28 -r1.29
--- decision-policy-v2.html	30 May 2011 21:28:32 -0000	1.28
+++ decision-policy-v2.html	30 May 2011 22:30:17 -0000	1.29
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@
 <p>Furthermore, as we move through W3C maturity levels, the process requires gradually locking
 down the spec. In particular:</p>
 
-<ul
+<ul>
 <li>If substantial technical changes are made after a Last Call Working Draft,
 then the Working Group cannot proceed to Candidate Recommendation and must
 publish another LCWD. While it is not entirely clear what kinds of changes are
@@ -821,6 +821,8 @@
 cannot proceed to Proposed Recommendation and must return to Working Draft
 status.</li>
 
+</ul>
+
 <p>Given these rules, it seems wise to be careful about anything that is even
 arguably a feature addition - even arguably ambiguous cases such as documenting
 longstanding de facto standard features.</p>
Received on Monday, 30 May 2011 22:30:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 May 2011 22:30:32 GMT