W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-commits@w3.org > May 2011

html5/decision-policy decision-policy.html,1.12,1.13

From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:45 +0000
To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QLu7V-0006GW-TJ@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv24060

Modified Files:
Log Message:
clarify what materials are considered when chairs look at survey results

Index: decision-policy.html
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -d -r1.12 -r1.13
--- decision-policy.html	21 Oct 2009 05:07:08 -0000	1.12
+++ decision-policy.html	16 May 2011 09:29:43 -0000	1.13
@@ -341,7 +341,12 @@
 reveal a strongly preferred position; in this case, return
 to <a href="#escalation-step-3">step 3</a>. Otherwise, the Working
 Group affirms or overrules the editor's decision depending on the
-outcome. The Basic Process then
+outcome. When reviewing the results of a survey, the Chairs will
+examine the Change Proposals, the survey responses themselves, and any
+material linked from a survey response. The Chairs do not guarantee
+that any other material, such as email to the WG list related to the
+topic, will be considered. Filtering such a volume of material is
+impractical. The Basic Process then
 proceeds from <a href="#basic-step-7a">step 7a</a>
 or <a href="#basic-step-7b">step 7b</a> as appropriate. <b>** This is
 an endpoint for the escalation process. **</b> </dd>
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 09:29:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:10:32 UTC