W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-commits@w3.org > May 2010

html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502 Overview.html,1.4,1.5

From: Manu Sporny via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 02:59:25 +0000
To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1O8lsT-0003Wk-Bt@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv13519

Modified Files:
	Overview.html 
Log Message:
Addressed BUG #8981 by adding a bullet item to Document Conformance in
HTML+RDFa spec.


Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -d -r1.4 -r1.5
--- Overview.html	3 May 2010 02:01:12 -0000	1.4
+++ Overview.html	3 May 2010 02:59:23 -0000	1.5
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@
 <li>Inclusion of the HTML Default Vocabulary Terms, which mirror the XHTML
 Default Vocabulary Terms, for the purpose of HTML/XHTML interoperability.</li>
 <li>Inclusion of a HTML 4.01 + RDFa 1.1 DTD for validation purposes.</li>
-<li>All bugs concerning HTML+RDFa have been addressed in the HTML WG bug 
+<li>Added normative definition of @version attribute.</li>
+<li>All bugs concerning HTML+RDFa have been processed in the HTML WG bug 
 tracker.</li>
 </ol>
 
@@ -138,6 +139,10 @@
     <a href="#extensions-to-the-html5-syntax">Extensions to the HTML5 Syntax</a>,
     as described in this document, <em class="rfc2119" title="must">must</em> be considered valid and conforming in 
     a HTML+RDFa 1.1 document.</li>
+    
+    <li>All HTML5 elements and attributes <em class="rfc2119" title="should">should</em> be used in a way that is
+    conformant with [<a class="bibref" rel="biblioentry" href="#bib-HTML5">HTML5</a>]. All RDFa attributes <em class="rfc2119" title="should">should</em> be used in a way that
+    is conformant with [<a class="bibref" rel="biblioentry" href="#bib-RDFA-CORE">RDFA-CORE</a>] and this document.</li>
 
     <li>There <em class="rfc2119" title="should">should</em> be a <code>version</code> attribute on the
     <code>html</code> element. The value of the <code>version</code>
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 02:59:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 3 May 2010 02:59:27 GMT