W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-commits@w3.org > July 2010

html5/decision-policy decision-policy-v2.html,1.10,1.11

From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:23:09 +0000
To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OdvMT-0001BW-PU@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv4540

Modified Files:
Log Message:
Address the following issue:

"co-chairs should also address objections raised in change proposals"

Index: decision-policy-v2.html
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -d -r1.10 -r1.11
--- decision-policy-v2.html	28 Jul 2010 01:12:04 -0000	1.10
+++ decision-policy-v2.html	28 Jul 2010 01:23:07 -0000	1.11
@@ -395,7 +395,10 @@
 reveal a strongly preferred position; in this case, return
 to <a href="#escalation-step-3">step 3</a>. Otherwise, the Working
 Group affirms or overrules the editor's decision depending on the
-outcome. The Basic Process then
+outcome. In that case, the Chairs will strive to identify the proposal
+that draws the weakest objections, taking under consideration
+objections raised in the straw poll, reasoning in the Change Proposals
+themselves, and other sources of information. The Basic Process then
 proceeds from <a href="#basic-step-7a">step 7a</a>
 or <a href="#basic-step-7b">step 7b</a> as appropriate. <b>** This is
 an endpoint for the escalation process. **</b> </dd>
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 01:23:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:09:55 UTC