W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-commits@w3.org > August 2010

html5/html4-differences Overview.html,1.107,1.108 Overview.src.html,1.85,1.86

From: Anne van Kesteren via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:30:54 +0000
To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OqRrS-0000h8-O3@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/html5/html4-differences
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv2655

Modified Files:
	Overview.html Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
type is optional; doh

Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/html4-differences/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.107
retrieving revision 1.108
diff -u -d -r1.107 -r1.108
--- Overview.html	31 Aug 2010 14:24:47 -0000	1.107
+++ Overview.html	31 Aug 2010 14:30:52 -0000	1.108
@@ -901,6 +901,10 @@
 
   <h3 id=changed-attributes><span class=secno>3.4. </span>Changed attributes</h3>
 
+  <p>The <code>type</code> attribute on <code>script</code> and
+   <code>style</code> is no longer required if the scripting language is
+   ECMAScript and the styling language is CSS respectively.
+
   <p>The following attributes are allowed but authors are discouraged from
    using them and instead strongly encouraged to use an alternative solution:
 

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/html4-differences/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.85
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -u -d -r1.85 -r1.86
--- Overview.src.html	31 Aug 2010 14:24:47 -0000	1.85
+++ Overview.src.html	31 Aug 2010 14:30:52 -0000	1.86
@@ -720,6 +720,11 @@
 
     <h3 id="changed-attributes">Changed attributes</h3>
 
+    <p>The <code>type</code> attribute on <code>script</code> and
+    <code>style</code> is no longer required if the scripting language is
+    ECMAScript and the styling language is CSS respectively.</p>
+
+
     <p>The following attributes are allowed but authors are discouraged from
     using them and instead strongly encouraged to use an alternative
     solution:</p>
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:31:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:10:05 UTC