W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-commits@w3.org > July 2009

html5/spec Overview.html,1.2527,1.2528

From: Ian Hickson via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:03:59 +0000
To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1MQWR5-0000MC-79@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/html5/spec
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv1358

Modified Files:
	Overview.html 
Log Message:
work in some consistency in the ways of referencing HTML4. (whatwg r3398)

Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2527
retrieving revision 1.2528
diff -u -d -r1.2527 -r1.2528
--- Overview.html	14 Jul 2009 01:01:33 -0000	1.2527
+++ Overview.html	14 Jul 2009 01:03:55 -0000	1.2528
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
      <li><a href="#compliance-with-other-specifications"><span class="secno">1.5.2 </span>Compliance with other specifications</a></ol></li>
    <li><a href="#relationships-to-other-specifications"><span class="secno">1.6 </span>Relationships to other specifications</a>
     <ol>
-     <li><a href="#relationship-to-html-4.01-and-dom2-html"><span class="secno">1.6.1 </span>Relationship to HTML 4.01 and DOM2 HTML</a></li>
+     <li><a href="#relationship-to-html-4.01-and-dom2-html"><span class="secno">1.6.1 </span>Relationship to HTML&nbsp;4.01 and DOM2 HTML</a></li>
      <li><a href="#relationship-to-xhtml-1.x"><span class="secno">1.6.2 </span>Relationship to XHTML 1.x</a></ol></li>
    <li><a href="#html-vs-xhtml"><span class="secno">1.7 </span>HTML vs XHTML</a></li>
    <li><a href="#structure-of-this-specification"><span class="secno">1.8 </span>Structure of this specification</a>
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@
   games), public telephone books or address books, communications
   software (e-mail clients, instant messaging clients, discussion
   software), document editing software, etc.<h3 id="history-0"><span class="secno">1.4 </span>History</h3><p><i>This section is non-normative.</i><p>Work on HTML&nbsp;5 originally started in late 2003, as a proof
-  of concept to show that it was possible to extend HTML4's forms to
+  of concept to show that it was possible to extend HTML&nbsp;4's forms to
   provide many of the features that XForms 1.0 introduced, without
   requiring browsers to implement rendering engines that were
   incompatible with existing HTML Web pages. At this early stage,
@@ -1259,9 +1259,9 @@
   specification violating the requirements of these other
   specifications. Whenever this has occurred, the transgressions have
   been noted as "<dfn id="willful-violation" title="willful violation">willful
-  violations</dfn>".<h3 id="relationships-to-other-specifications"><span class="secno">1.6 </span>Relationships to other specifications</h3><h4 id="relationship-to-html-4.01-and-dom2-html"><span class="secno">1.6.1 </span>Relationship to HTML 4.01 and DOM2 HTML</h4><p><i>This section is non-normative.</i><p>This specification describes a new revision of the HTML language
+  violations</dfn>".<h3 id="relationships-to-other-specifications"><span class="secno">1.6 </span>Relationships to other specifications</h3><h4 id="relationship-to-html-4.01-and-dom2-html"><span class="secno">1.6.1 </span>Relationship to HTML&nbsp;4.01 and DOM2 HTML</h4><p><i>This section is non-normative.</i><p>This specification describes a new revision of the HTML language
   and its associated DOM API.<p>The requirements in this specification for features that were
-  already in HTML4 and DOM2 HTML are based primarily on the
+  already in HTML&nbsp;4 and DOM2 HTML are based primarily on the
   implementation and deployment experience collected over the past ten
   years. Some features have been removed from the language, based on
   best current practices; implementation requirements for some of
@@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@
   garnered wide use, are still included in this specification to allow
   implementations to continue supporting legacy content.  <a href="#references">[HTML4]</a> <a href="#references">[DOM2HTML]</a><p>A separate document has been published by the W3C HTML working
   group to provide a more detailed reference of the differences
-  between this specification and the language described in the HTML 4
+  between this specification and the language described in the HTML&nbsp;4
   specification. <a href="#references">[HTMLDIFF]</a><h4 id="relationship-to-xhtml-1.x"><span class="secno">1.6.2 </span>Relationship to XHTML 1.x</h4><p><i>This section is non-normative.</i><p>This specification is intended to replace XHTML 1.0 as the
   normative definition of the XML serialization of the HTML
   vocabulary. <a href="#references">[XHTML10]</a><p>While this specification updates the semantics and requirements
@@ -52456,8 +52456,8 @@
    close resemblance to SGML and XML, it is a separate language with
    its own parsing rules.</p>
 
-   <p>Some earlier versions of HTML (in particular from HTML2 to
-   HTML4) were based on SGML and used SGML parsing rules. However, few
+   <p>Some earlier versions of HTML (in particular from HTML&nbsp;2 to
+   HTML&nbsp;4) were based on SGML and used SGML parsing rules. However, few
    (if any) web browsers ever implemented true SGML parsing for HTML
    documents; the only user agents to strictly handle HTML as an SGML
    application have historically been validators. The resulting
@@ -55243,7 +55243,7 @@
     identifier, or system identifier, switch to a conformance checking
     mode for another language (e.g. based on the DOCTYPE token a
     conformance checker could recognize that the document is an
-    HTML4-era document, and defer to an HTML4 conformance
+    HTML&nbsp;4-era document, and defer to an HTML&nbsp;4 conformance
     checker.)</p>
 
     <p>Append a <code>DocumentType</code> node to the
@@ -63845,7 +63845,7 @@
 
   <h4 id="warnings-for-obsolete-but-conforming-features"><span class="secno">12.1.1 </span>Warnings for obsolete but conforming features</h4>
 
-  <p>To ease the transition from HTML4 Transitional documents to the
+  <p>To ease the transition from HTML&nbsp;4 Transitional documents to the
   language defined in <em>this</em> specification, and to discourage
   certain features that are only allowed in very few circumstances,
   conformance checkers are required to warn the user when the
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2009 01:04:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 14 July 2009 01:04:07 GMT