W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Question / Request for HTML or CSS

From: Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 14:50:34 +0300
Message-ID: <5158230A.8060006@kolumbus.fi>
To: public-html-comments@w3.org
2013-03-30 18:57, Allen Flick wrote:
> The silliest thing you can do, as the authority on web standards, is 
> leave <marquee>
> scrolling text</marquee> the way it is ..... totally in limbo, letting 
> each browser decide
> to implement it or not.

That's not what HTML5 drafts are doing. On the contrary, they define the 
<marquee> element (for the first time in history - existing HTML 
specifications are totally ignorant of it) and require that browsers 
support it. They also say that you must not use it, but there is really 
no army or police that is going to stop you, or even a lawyer to sue you.

Description of <marquee> in HTML5 Candidate Recommendation:

A useful clarification:

"For example, user agents will be required to support the marquee 
element, but authors must not use the marquee element in conforming 

It is important to make the distinction between the rules that apply to 
user agents and the rules that apply to authors for producing conforming 
documents. They are completely orthogonal."


In effect, this means that two language versions are defined (very 
similarly to Strict vs. Transitional in HTML 4.01): the language that 
authors should (or "shall") use, and the language that browsers are 
required to use, i.e. the "conforming" language and the "real" language. 
However,  the documents don't put things this way, since the language 
designers think that it would encourage authors into using language 
features that they (the language designers) don't like.

Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Sunday, 31 March 2013 11:51:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:26:29 UTC