W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > November 2012

Re: RDFa Lite

From: Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:31:01 +0200
Message-ID: <50B61215.6050906@kolumbus.fi>
To: public-html-comments@w3.org
2012-11-27 22:25, Dennis Erny wrote:
> RDFa Lite has a smaller footprint, byte-for-byte, compared to 
> Microdata. This alone is enough for me to utilize it over Hickson’s 
> creation (and I do, extensively at http://reuze.me).
That sounds interesting. I wonder whether Schema.org still focuses on 
microdata, as they describe at

After all, it is the potential consumers of metadata that matter most 
here. On the other hand, there does not seem to be evidence about 
web-wide use of metadata in any of the competing formats, in major 
search engines. We can see that Google uses it for specialized searches, 
but it seems to extract such data from large commercial or community 
sites only, according to criteria that have not been disclosed. But 
according to Schema.org information, using microdata seems to be the 
best shot.

Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 13:31:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:26:28 UTC