W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > March 2011

Re: PUT and DELETE methods in form@method

From: Simpson, Grant Leyton <glsimpso@indiana.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:29:31 +0000
To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>, "T.J. Crowder" <tj@crowdersoftware.com>
CC: "public-html-comments@w3.org" <public-html-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C9B8A7C6.C187%glsimpso@indiana.edu>
Right, but this does still does not cover specifying how the user agent
should respond to a HTTP 200 and how that response integrates with a given
application.

On 3/30/11 9:10 AM, "Dominik Tomaszuk" <ddooss@wp.pl> wrote:

>It could be supported in the same way as POST: 200 OK (describing or
>containing the result of the action). HTTP in PUT and DELETE allowed 200
>if an existing resource is modified in PUT or if it is a successful
>response (and it is consistent with the approach RESTful).
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 13:30:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 June 2011 00:14:06 GMT