RE: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code]

> I'm currently interested in a discussion that leads to something that
> *could* be added to the HTML spec, and might lead to clarifications in the HTTPbis specs.

Filing a bug and then starting a discussion on the public-html@w3.org list is the recommended path to achieve this kind of goal.  Even if you only think there is some chance that the "change" would occur in the HTML spec filing a bug is quite appropriate.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329

-----Original Message-----
From: public-html-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 3:29 PM
To: Sam Ruby
Cc: nathan@webr3.org; public-html-comments@w3.org; www-archive; mike amundsen
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code]

On 01.04.2011 21:04, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 04/01/2011 02:01 PM, Nathan wrote:
>> fwd'ing to some relevant lists - would be very happy to see a proper 
>> response from W3C / HTML WG chairs, particularly the question "And
>> *where* should this activity happen?"
>
> Where is in bug reports:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
>
> Should you (or anyone) wish to escalate a proposed RESOLUTION by the 
> editor, you will be encouraged to join the working group and 
> participate by creating a proposal and participating in the discussion:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/#join
>
>> best, nathan
>
> - Sam Ruby

I'm currently interested in a discussion that leads to something that
*could* be added to the HTML spec, and might lead to clarifications in the HTTPbis specs.

I don't think an issue tracker is the right place for that.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Sunday, 3 April 2011 00:38:57 UTC