I'd just like to draw attention to some posts by Shelley providing support for commenting on the specs: http://realtech.burningbird.net/reviewcomment-w3c-html5-specification http://realtech.burningbird.net/how-comment-and-when http://realtech.burningbird.net/reviewcomment-w3c-html5-specification/html5-document-structure I think these are really good and helpful, esp. for people new to the spec and the W3C. One thing I notice about the HTMLWG's home page: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ is that it's *not* particularly friendly to such an audience (it's a more typical working WG page; there's not even a list of links to tutorials, or to these wikipedia pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(HTML5) something akin to the latter will be invaluable). Given the wide and diverse reviewers expected and desired for last call, I think it would be very good to have a more friendly entry point. I know there are other sources of friendliness, so I don't think it necessarily requires a huge chunk of work on the WG's part. Cheers, Bijan.Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 08:20:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 June 2011 00:14:05 GMT