- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:42:22 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, public-html-comments@w3.org, Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
Hi Maciej and all, What recourse do non-members have then if they are unsatisfied with a bug resolution? Should they file formal objections? Thanks. Best Regards, Laura > On Aug 25, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: > >> Sam Ruby wrote: >>> On 08/25/2010 06:28 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: >>>> I'm volunteering to write a change proposal for Issue 117. >>> >>> In that case, I encourage you to rejoin the working group. >> >> Is this a requirement? I can understand that it is simpler to only have >> members propose change proposals--they need to be shepherded through the >> decision process. I can withhold my submission for a time to see if others >> volunteer. >> >> As is obvious, I am intensely interested in HTML5. Frankly, though, I >> don't feel comfortable with the HTML WG. I'm not sure re-joining would be >> good for myself, or for the group. I get the impression that I am an >> unwelcome disruption. >> >> If this is a requirement for change proposals, I need to think on it. > > I can understand your hesitation. But on the other hand, it can also be > difficult for the group if a non-Member of the WG is participating > extensively in WG activities, beyond the level of just commenting on spec > issues. > >> >>>> I asked to re-open Issue 106[1]. As I stated, I believe that the >>>> longdesc issue--including making obsolete an attribute that was valid in >>>> HTML4, without any intervening period of deprecation--is new >>>> information, as is the new interest in this topic. If you do, I will >>>> also write a change proposal for this item, too. >>> >>> As issue 106 was closed without prejudice, new information is not a >>> requirement. >>> >> That's good to know. I hope you do re-open it, then. Perhaps after Issue >> 41, or some of the others are resolved. > > For ISSUE-106, or any other issue that was closed without prejudice, we will > reopen if we receive a completed Change Proposal. I think the same concerns > would apply about a non-WG member writing a proposal. > > Regards, > Maciej > > > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 01:44:50 UTC