W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Alternate syntax for defining class attribute

From: T.J. Crowder <tj@crowdersoftware.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:11:49 +0100
Message-ID: <q2kc95470a1004100411n59f7a16cib34910af3b75b0a6@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com>, Arthur Clifford <art@artspad.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "Musgrove, Jason L" <J.L.Musgrove2@wlv.ac.uk>, public-html-comments@w3.org
> > I should have said, or indeed asked, are we past last call for *new*
> > proposals?
> > ...
>
> Officially, no.

Thanks Julian. Regardless, I still don't see this in HTML5, it's too much of
a change for where it seems to me we are.

Thanks again,

-- T.J.


On 10 April 2010 12:06, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 10.04.2010 12:52, T.J. Crowder wrote:
>
>> Julian,
>>
>>  > > For one thing, we're after last call, aren't we?
>>  > No, we aren't.
>>
>> Thanks. Sorry, that was very sloppy terminology on my part, obviously
>> there are still a number of outstanding bugs/issues (per section 3 of
>> the last status report, "Getting to Last Call").
>>
>> I should have said, or indeed asked, are we past last call for *new*
>> proposals?
>> ...
>>
>
> Officially, no.
>
>  Apologies, I'm sure this is documented somewhere. I kicked around the
>> working group pages but I'm still relatively new to the working group's
>> page structure (and terminology).
>> ...
>>
>
> You found the status report, which is probably the best summary of where we
> are.
>
> Going back to the proposal: similar proposals have been made in the past,
> and have been rejected back then (several reasons that come to mind:
> fallback behaviour, incompatibility with XML serialization), so I'd be
> really surprised for this to get new considerations unless better reasons
> than back then are presented (and sorry, I don't have a link to these
> discussions right now).
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
Received on Saturday, 10 April 2010 11:12:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 June 2011 00:14:02 GMT