W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Alternate syntax for defining class attribute

From: T.J. Crowder <tj@crowdersoftware.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:52:24 +0100
Message-ID: <s2qc95470a1004100352p3db477cye749d1a292222c1b@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com>, Arthur Clifford <art@artspad.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "Musgrove, Jason L" <J.L.Musgrove2@wlv.ac.uk>, public-html-comments@w3.org

> > For one thing, we're after last call, aren't we?
> No, we aren't.

Thanks. Sorry, that was very sloppy terminology on my part, obviously there
are still a number of outstanding bugs/issues (per section 3 of the last
status report, "Getting to Last Call").

I should have said, or indeed asked, are we past last call for *new*

Apologies, I'm sure this is documented somewhere. I kicked around the
working group pages but I'm still relatively new to the working group's page
structure (and terminology).


-- T.J.

On 10 April 2010 11:15, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 10.04.2010 09:51, T.J. Crowder wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Thanks again, all, for the comments.
>> First off, there's no question in my mind that this proposal will not be
>> part of HTML5. For one thing, we're after last call, aren't we? Even if
> No, we aren't.
>  ...
> Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 10 April 2010 10:53:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:26:26 UTC