Re: Alternate syntax for defining class attribute

Julian,

> > For one thing, we're after last call, aren't we?
> No, we aren't.

Thanks. Sorry, that was very sloppy terminology on my part, obviously there
are still a number of outstanding bugs/issues (per section 3 of the last
status report, "Getting to Last Call").

I should have said, or indeed asked, are we past last call for *new*
proposals?

Apologies, I'm sure this is documented somewhere. I kicked around the
working group pages but I'm still relatively new to the working group's page
structure (and terminology).

Thanks,

-- T.J.


On 10 April 2010 11:15, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 10.04.2010 09:51, T.J. Crowder wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks again, all, for the comments.
>>
>> First off, there's no question in my mind that this proposal will not be
>> part of HTML5. For one thing, we're after last call, aren't we? Even if
>>
>
> No, we aren't.
>
>  ...
>>
>
> Best regards, Julian
>